(A selection of radical thoughts about learning and education from Mobilityshifts event – Part 2)
‘We need to refuse anonymous peer review’
Geert Lovink gave a presentation about the different publication methods that Institute of Network Cultures has been using so far (Studies in Network Culture, INC Readers, Network Notebooks and Theory on Demand. He also made some general remarks about ‘Do-It-Together Publishing’. I especially appreciate the idea that one of the aims of the publishing process is to further radicalize both the content and style.
– – – –
INC Principles of Do-It-Together Publishing
- Collective decision making over the choice of format, length and deadline
- Promotion of the concept/essay style
- Regular support, both content-based and emotional assistance in writing process
- Intense copy editing, in particular in the case of non-native English writers, with the aim to further radicalize both the content and style
- Dealing together with the digital delivery
Larger Agenda of D.i.T Publishing
- Refuse peer review and disassociate from IP-driven publishers (common exodus)
- Conversion to a system of mutual aid
- Critical engagement with open access standards (incl. software and typography)
- Engagement in dialogue, discussion, comment cultures (social reading)
- Networks to share experiences how best to distribute titles through multiple platforms
– – – –
Video recording of Geert’s presentation can be found online: http://vimeo.com/32725309
Here are a couple of quotes (at approx 25:00 in the presentation):
‘The peer review system as it exists in the academic world isĀ is corrupt to its core’ –
‘In particular of course anonymous peer reviewing, which is so largely used to bring down the self-esteem of many many people, it’s a very humiliating form of discussion’ – ‘it’s the most nasty form of contemporary debate we have’
Related links: